Material Comparisons Material Comparison

PC vs PA66: Which High-Performance Plastic Wins?

Tensile data verified against MatWeb.com database & manufacturer datasheets · Last updated July 2026

Published: 2026-07-21

Quick Reference

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PC (Polycarbonate) if:Transparent enclosures, safety equipment, optical components, electronic housings, applications requiring impact resistance at low temperatures and dimensional stability without...

°C PEEK 343°C PTFE 260°C Ultem PEI 217°C PPS 180°C
Continuous service temperature comparison — high-performance thermoplastics. Data from manufacturer specifications.

Which Material Should You Choose?

Choose PC (Polycarbonate) if:

  • Transparent enclosures, safety equipment, optical components, electronic housings, applications requiring impact resistance at low temperatures and dimensional stability without moisture effects

Choose PA66 (Nylon 66) if:

  • Mechanical components under load
  • gears, bearings, fasteners, structural brackets, fuel system components, applications requiring higher strength, fatigue resistance, and chemical resistance to fuels and oils

Price Comparison

PC (Polycarbonate): $5-12/kg vs PA66 (Nylon 66): $4-8/kg · Prices vary by grade and quantity

Polycarbonate (PC) and Nylon (PA66) represent two fundamentally different classes of engineering thermoplastics: amorphous vs semicrystalline. This structural difference drives every aspect of their performance — optical properties, mechanical behavior, chemical resistance, moisture sensitivity, and processing. The choice between them is rarely ambiguous: if you need transparency or impact resistance, PC wins; if you need mechanical strength, wear resistance, or fuel resistance, Nylon wins.

When to choose Polycarbonate: PC is the standard for any application requiring transparency combined with impact resistance. Its 87-91% light transmission and 600-900 J/m notched Izod impact strength make it irreplaceable for: safety equipment (hard hats, safety goggles, face shields), transparent enclosures (machine guards, display cases), optical components (LED lenses, light pipes, optical instrument windows), and electronic device housings where internal component visibility matters (medical devices, instrumentation). PC's amorphous structure provides excellent dimensional stability — it absorbs only 0.15% moisture, meaning parts maintain tolerances regardless of humidity. PC's HDT of 130-140°C (at 1.82 MPa) exceeds Nylon's dry HDT (75-90°C), giving PC better short-term heat resistance for unreinforced grades. PC is also the standard for bullet-resistant glazing (laminated PC sheets) and riot shields, where its combination of transparency and virtually unbreakable impact performance is unmatched.

When to choose Nylon PA66: Nylon is the standard for mechanical components operating under load — gears, bearings, bushings, fasteners, clips, and structural brackets. Its semicrystalline structure provides 20-30% higher tensile strength than PC (82 vs 60-70 MPa dry), superior fatigue resistance (critical for cyclically loaded parts like gears and snap-fits), and excellent wear and abrasion resistance (critical for bearing and sliding applications). Nylon's chemical resistance to fuels, oils, and hydrocarbons makes it the standard for automotive fuel system components (fuel rails, quick-connect fittings, filter bodies) — PC is attacked by gasoline and many solvents, making it unsuitable for fuel contact. Nylon GF30 (30% glass fiber reinforced) offers 180-210 MPa tensile strength and 245°C HDT — far exceeding PC GF30's 100-130 MPa and 140°C HDT. For under-hood automotive applications and high-temperature structural components, Nylon GF30 is the clear choice.

Critical limitations to consider: PC has two significant weaknesses: (1) Environmental stress cracking — PC is susceptible to sudden brittle failure when exposed to certain solvents (gasoline, acetone, methylene chloride, toluene) under tensile stress. A PC part that is perfectly impact-resistant can crack catastrophically if splashed with solvent while under load. (2) UV degradation — PC yellows and embrittles with UV exposure, requiring UV stabilizers for outdoor applications. Nylon's main weakness is moisture absorption — at 50% RH equilibrium, Nylon 66 absorbs 2.5% water, causing 0.7% linear dimensional swelling, 30-40% reduction in tensile strength and modulus, and 50-100% increase in impact toughness. This means Nylon parts designed at dry-as-molded properties will be oversized (swollen) and weaker (but tougher) in service. Designers must account for moisture-conditioned properties, not dry properties, for any Nylon part that will see ambient humidity.

Comparison at a Glance

Material APC (Polycarbonate)
Material BPA66 (Nylon 66)
Polymer TypePC: Amorphous (Tg 147°C) | PA66: Semicrystalline (Tm 260°C, Tg 70°C)
Continuous Temp A115 °C
Continuous Temp B80 °C (dry) / 120 °C (GF30)
Tensile Strength A60-70 MPa (unfilled) / 100-130 MPa (GF30)
Tensile Strength B82 MPa (dry) / 55 MPa (conditioned) / 180-210 MPa (GF30)
Cost RelativePC and PA66 are similarly priced ($3-6/kg unfilled); PA66 GF30 is slightly less expensive than PC GF30
Best For ATransparent enclosures, safety equipment, optical components, electronic housings, applications requiring impact resistance at low temperatures and dimensional stability without moisture effects
Best For BMechanical components under load — gears, bearings, fasteners, structural brackets, fuel system components, applications requiring higher strength, fatigue resistance, and chemical resistance to fuels and oils
Key DifferentiatorPC: amorphous, transparent (87-91% light transmission), superior impact strength (600-900 J/m notched Izod), excellent dimensional stability (no moisture absorption), but poor chemical resistance to solvents and fuels. PA66: semicrystalline, opaque, higher tensile strength (82 vs 60-70 MPa), superior fatigue and wear resistance, chemical resistance to fuels and oils, but absorbs moisture (2.5% at equilibrium) causing dimensional change and property shifts.
Share this page Share on X

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Polycarbonate be used for gears?

Not for power transmission gears. PC's low fatigue resistance, poor wear properties, and susceptibility to environmental stress cracking make it unsuitable for gears under load. PC is sometimes used for instrument gears in low-load, low-speed applications (e.g., speedometer drives, clock mechanisms) where transparency or impact resistance is desired, but for any gear transmitting torque or experiencing cyclic loading, Nylon (especially PA66 GF30) or Acetal (POM) is the correct choice. PC's amorphous structure lacks the crystalline domains that provide wear resistance and fatigue strength in semicrystalline engineering plastics like Nylon and Acetal.

Which material is better for outdoor use?

Neither is ideal for unprotected outdoor use without stabilization. PC yellows and embrittles under UV exposure — UV stabilizers (benzotriazole, benzophenone) are mandatory for outdoor PC applications, and even stabilized PC will yellow over 5-10 years. Nylon absorbs moisture from humid outdoor air, causing dimensional changes and property shifts. For outdoor applications, Nylon GF30 with UV stabilizer is generally preferred over PC for structural parts (gears, brackets, housings) due to its superior chemical resistance and mechanical properties. For transparent outdoor applications (glazing, windows), PC with hard coat and UV stabilizer is the standard — but acrylic (PMMA) often outperforms both for long-term outdoor transparency.

Why does Nylon get weaker when it absorbs moisture?

Moisture acts as a plasticizer in Nylon's amorphous regions — water molecules insert between polymer chains, increasing chain mobility and spacing. This plasticization reduces tensile strength by 30-40% (from 82 MPa dry to ~55 MPa at 2.5% moisture) and reduces flexural modulus by 40-50%, making the material more flexible. However, plasticization simultaneously increases impact toughness by 50-100% and elongation at break — the material becomes more ductile and less brittle. This is why Nylon gears and bearings often perform better in service (where they are moisture-conditioned) than dry-as-molded tests suggest. The key for designers is to use moisture-conditioned properties (not dry properties) for any Nylon part that will operate in ambient humidity. For applications requiring stable properties regardless of moisture, specify PC, Acetal (POM), or PEEK.

Related Diagnostics & Materials

Material Comparisons

PEEK vs Ultem PEI: Which High-Performance Polymer Should...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) if:Extreme chemical + thermal environments (oil...

Material Comparisons

PPS Ryton vs LCP Vectra: Which Ultra-Flow High-Temp...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PPS Ryton if:Chemical exposure + moderate flow length (automotive...

Material Comparisons

PTFE Teflon vs PEEK: Chemical Resistance vs Mechanical...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PTFE Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene) if:Seals, gaskets, liningswhere...

Material Comparisons

Vespel Polyimide vs PEEK: When the Highest-Temperature...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Vespel PI (Polyimide) if:Aerospace engine, semiconductor plasma, ultra-high...

Material Comparisons

Torlon PAI vs Vespel PI: Ultimate High-Temperature...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Torlon PAI (Polyamide-imide) if:lower cost, easier processingChoose Vespel...

Material Comparisons

Glass Fiber vs Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics:...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Glass Fiber Reinforced (GFR) if:Lower cost and easier processingChoose...

Material Comparisons

PEEK vs Torlon PAI: Complete Property, Cost &...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) if:PEEK offers melt-processability and lower...

Material Comparisons

Ultem PEI vs Polysulfone PSU: High-Temperature Amorphous...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Ultem PEI (Polyetherimide) if:Ultem offers 60°C higher HDT and inherent...

References & Industry Standards

  • ASTM International. Standard Specifications for Engineering Plastics & Thermoplastics. astm.org
  • UL Prospector. Plastics & Elastomers Material Database. ulprospector.com
  • MatWeb. Material Property Data for Engineering Thermoplastics. matweb.com
  • ISO 1043. Plastics — Symbols and Abbreviated Terms. iso.org