Material Comparisons Material Comparison

PEEK vs PTFE Teflon: Complete Engineering Comparison (2026) — Temperature, Strength, Cost

Tensile data verified against MatWeb.com database & manufacturer datasheets · Last updated July 2026

Published: 2026-07-16

Quick Reference

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) if:Structural load-bearing components at high temperaturegears, bearings, brackets, downhole toolsapplications requiring both chemical resistance and mechanical strengthChoose...

°C PEEK 343°C PTFE 260°C Ultem PEI 217°C PPS 180°C
Continuous service temperature comparison — high-performance thermoplastics. Data from manufacturer specifications.

Which Material Should You Choose?

Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) if:

  • Structural load-bearing components at high temperature
  • gears, bearings, brackets, downhole tools
  • applications requiring both chemical resistance and mechanical strength

Choose PTFE Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene) if:

  • Seals, gaskets, and liners where low friction and universal chemical inertness dominate
  • non-load-bearing chemical barrier applications

Price Comparison

PEEK (Polyetheretherketone): $80-200/kg vs PTFE Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene): $25-60/kg · Prices vary by grade and quantity

PEEK and PTFE are both elite high-performance polymers rated for 260°C continuous service, but they occupy fundamentally different positions in the engineering design space. PEEK is a structural thermoplastic with 4× the tensile strength of PTFE, excellent fatigue resistance, and full melt-processability via injection molding. PTFE offers the lowest coefficient of friction of any solid (0.04) and the broadest chemical resistance of any polymer, but cannot be injection molded and has negligible mechanical strength. The choice between them is determined by whether the application demands structural load-bearing (PEEK) or friction/chemical barrier performance (PTFE).

Property Comparison

Tensile Strength: PEEK: 100 MPa / PTFE: 25 MPa. PEEK is 4× stronger — this is the single most important differentiator. PTFE's low strength limits it to compressive-load or self-supporting liner applications. Flexural Modulus: PEEK: 4.1 GPa / PTFE: 0.5 GPa. PEEK is 8× stiffer, enabling structural components with predictable deflection. PTFE is so flexible that it cold-flows (creeps) under sustained load — a PTFE gasket under bolt load will relax over time, requiring spring-energized designs. Coefficient of Friction: PEEK: 0.20-0.35 (unfilled) / PTFE: 0.04-0.10. PTFE's near-zero friction makes it the gold standard for dynamic seals and bearing surfaces. PEEK bearing-grade formulations (CF/PTFE/graphite filled) reduce friction to ~0.10, bridging the gap. Chemical Resistance: PTFE is inert to virtually every chemical including aqua regia, molten alkali, and all organic solvents — no polymer matches PTFE's chemical universality. PEEK resists most chemicals but is attacked by concentrated sulfuric acid and some halogens. For 95% of chemical environments, both are excellent; for the most aggressive chemistry, PTFE is the only option. Processability: PEEK is injection-moldable (360-400°C melt, 160-200°C mold), enabling complex net-shape parts in high volume. PTFE cannot be melt-processed — it decomposes before flowing. PTFE parts are made by sintering compressed powder or ram-extruding, limiting geometries and increasing cost for complex shapes. Wear Resistance: Unfilled PTFE has poor wear resistance (high PV limit but rapid material loss). PEEK bearing-grade (e.g., Victrex PEEK 450FC30) offers 100× the wear life of unfilled PTFE in boundary-lubricated conditions. Cost: PEEK: $80-200/kg / PTFE: $25-60/kg. PTFE is 30-50% the cost of PEEK per kg, but PTFE's inability to be injection molded means piece-part costs can be higher for complex geometries.

Decision Matrix

Choose PEEK When: (1) The part must bear tensile, flexural, or fatigue loads — structural brackets, gears, bearing cages, compressor valve plates; (2) Complex geometry requires injection molding — PTFE cannot achieve net-shape for intricate features; (3) Long-term creep resistance under load is required — PTFE cold-flows, PEEK does not; (4) Dynamic sealing with structural backup is needed — PEEK spring-energized seal with PTFE lip is a common hybrid; (5) Tribological performance under load is needed — PEEK bearing-grade outwears unfilled PTFE by 100×. Choose PTFE When: (1) The application is a seal, gasket, or liner where chemical inertness and low friction dominate; (2) Universal chemical resistance is required — PTFE handles chemicals that attack PEEK; (3) The part geometry is simple enough for sintering or machining from stock; (4) Non-structural chemical barrier applications — pipe linings, valve seats, pump diaphragms; (5) Low friction is the primary design driver — PTFE's 0.04 coefficient of friction cannot be matched by any PEEK formulation.

Comparison at a Glance

Material APEEK (Polyetheretherketone)
Material BPTFE Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene)
Polymer TypePEEK: Semicrystalline (Tm 343°C) | PTFE: Fluoropolymer Semicrystalline (Tm 327°C)
Continuous Temp A260 °C
Continuous Temp B260 °C
Tensile Strength A100 MPa
Tensile Strength B25 MPa
Cost RelativePEEK is 2-3× more expensive than PTFE
Best For AStructural load-bearing components at high temperature; gears, bearings, brackets, downhole tools; applications requiring both chemical resistance and mechanical strength
Best For BSeals, gaskets, and liners where low friction and universal chemical inertness dominate; non-load-bearing chemical barrier applications

Equivalents & Cross-References

Equivalent / AlternateAction
PEEK-vs-PTFE
PEEK-vs-Teflon
polyetheretherketone-vs-polytetrafluoroethylene
Share this page Share on X

Frequently Asked Questions

Can PEEK bearing-grade replace PTFE in dynamic seal applications?

PEEK bearing-grade (carbon fiber + PTFE + graphite filled, e.g., Victrex 450FC30) can replace PTFE in dynamic seals where the seal also functions as a structural component — spring-energized lip seals, backup rings, and bearing cages. PEEK bearing-grade offers comparable friction (~0.10 vs 0.04 for PTFE) with dramatically better wear resistance and no cold-flow. However, for pure sliding-contact seals against aggressive chemicals where PTFE's 0.04 friction and universal chemical inertness are critical, PTFE remains superior. The most reliable approach for demanding applications is a PTFE lip with PEEK structural backup — the PTFE handles the interface, the PEEK provides spring-back.

Why can't PTFE be injection molded like PEEK?

PTFE's melt viscosity is approximately 10¹¹ Pa·s at its melting point — it is a billion times more viscous than typical injection-moldable polymers. PTFE does not flow when melted; it transitions from a crystalline solid to a transparent gel-like state that retains its shape. This is because PTFE's molecular weight (typically 10⁶-10⁷ g/mol) and extremely strong carbon-fluorine bonds prevent chain disentanglement. Attempting to injection mold PTFE would require pressures exceeding machine capability and would decompose the polymer before achieving flow. PTFE parts are manufactured by compression molding sintered preforms or ram extrusion — processes that shape the powder under pressure, then heat above Tm to fuse particles without flow.

Related Diagnostics & Materials

Material Comparisons

PEEK vs Ultem PEI: Which High-Performance Polymer Should...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) if:Extreme chemical + thermal environments (oil...

Material Comparisons

PPS Ryton vs LCP Vectra: Which Ultra-Flow High-Temp...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PPS Ryton if:Chemical exposure + moderate flow length (automotive...

Material Comparisons

PTFE Teflon vs PEEK: Chemical Resistance vs Mechanical...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PTFE Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene) if:Seals, gaskets, liningswhere...

Material Comparisons

Vespel Polyimide vs PEEK: When the Highest-Temperature...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Vespel PI (Polyimide) if:Aerospace engine, semiconductor plasma, ultra-high...

Material Comparisons

Torlon PAI vs Vespel PI: Ultimate High-Temperature...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Torlon PAI (Polyamide-imide) if:lower cost, easier processingChoose Vespel...

Material Comparisons

Glass Fiber vs Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics:...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Glass Fiber Reinforced (GFR) if:Lower cost and easier processingChoose...

Material Comparisons

PEEK vs Torlon PAI: Complete Property, Cost &...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) if:PEEK offers melt-processability and lower...

Material Comparisons

Ultem PEI vs Polysulfone PSU: High-Temperature Amorphous...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Ultem PEI (Polyetherimide) if:Ultem offers 60°C higher HDT and inherent...

References & Industry Standards

  • ASTM International. Standard Specifications for Engineering Plastics & Thermoplastics. astm.org
  • UL Prospector. Plastics & Elastomers Material Database. ulprospector.com
  • MatWeb. Material Property Data for Engineering Thermoplastics. matweb.com
  • ISO 1043. Plastics — Symbols and Abbreviated Terms. iso.org