Material Comparisons Material Comparison

Nylon PA66 vs Acetal POM: Complete Engineering Comparison (2026) — Temperature, Strength, Cost

Tensile data verified against MatWeb.com database & manufacturer datasheets · Last updated July 2026

Published: 2026-07-16

Quick Reference

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Nylon PA66 if:Higher-load mechanical componentsgears, bearings, and bushings requiring toughness and fatigue resistanceapplications involving impact or vibrationChoose Acetal POM (Polyoxymethylene)...

°C PEEK 343°C PTFE 260°C Ultem PEI 217°C PPS 180°C
Continuous service temperature comparison — high-performance thermoplastics. Data from manufacturer specifications.

Which Material Should You Choose?

Choose Nylon PA66 if:

  • Higher-load mechanical components
  • gears, bearings, and bushings requiring toughness and fatigue resistance
  • applications involving impact or vibration

Choose Acetal POM (Polyoxymethylene) if:

  • Precision gears and dimensional-critical components
  • low-friction unlubricated bearing surfaces
  • fuel system components requiring fuel resistance without moisture effects

Price Comparison

Nylon PA66: $4-8/kg vs Acetal POM (Polyoxymethylene): $5-10/kg · Prices vary by grade and quantity

Nylon PA66 and Acetal POM (Delrin, Celcon) are the two most widely used engineering thermoplastics for mechanical components — gears, bearings, bushings, fasteners, and structural parts. They are similarly priced and both process easily on standard injection molding machines, but they differ fundamentally in how they interact with moisture, their friction and wear characteristics, and their mechanical toughness. The choice between them is typically determined by three factors: moisture sensitivity, toughness requirement, and dimensional precision.

Property Comparison

Tensile Strength (dry as molded): Nylon 66: 82 MPa / Acetal: 62 MPa. Nylon is 32% stronger in the dry condition. However, Nylon absorbs moisture (up to 2.5% at 50% RH equilibrium), which reduces tensile strength to ~55 MPa while increasing toughness. Acetal's moisture absorption is minimal (0.22%), so its properties are stable across humidity ranges. Impact Toughness: Nylon is significantly tougher than Acetal — Nylon 66 notched Izod is 50 J/m (dry) increasing to 100+ J/m when moist; Acetal is 60-70 J/m and does not change with moisture. Nylon's toughness advantage grows in moist or impact-loaded conditions. Friction & Wear: Acetal has a lower coefficient of friction (0.10-0.20 vs 0.20-0.30 for dry Nylon) and superior resistance to creep and fatigue in bearing applications. Acetal is the preferred material for precision gears and unlubricated bearings where dimensional stability and low friction are critical. Nylon develops a beneficial surface film when lubricated, giving excellent bearing performance in greased or oil-lubricated applications. Moisture Absorption: Nylon 66: 1.5% (24h), 2.5% (equilibrium at 50% RH) / Acetal: 0.22% (24h), 0.25% (equilibrium). This is the most consequential difference — Nylon's moisture absorption causes dimensional swelling (~0.7% linear at 2.5% moisture), property changes (toughness increases, strength decreases, modulus drops), and requires moisture conditioning of parts before assembly in precision applications. Acetal's dimensional stability is excellent regardless of humidity. Chemical Resistance: Nylon resists hydrocarbons, oils, and fuels — it is widely used in fuel system components (fuel rails, quick-connect fittings, filter bodies). However, Nylon is attacked by strong acids and oxidizing agents. Acetal resists a wide range of solvents and chemicals but is attacked by strong acids and oxidizers; critically, Acetal is NOT resistant to hot water or steam — it depolymerizes (unzips) in hot water above 60°C, a catastrophic failure mode. HDT at 1.82 MPa: Nylon 66: 75°C (dry) / Acetal: 85°C. Acetal's higher HDT provides a modest advantage in short-term heat resistance, but Nylon 66 GF30 (HDT 245°C) far exceeds Acetal's capability for under-hood applications. Cost: Both materials are in the $4-10/kg range — Nylon 66 is slightly less expensive, but the difference is typically not a deciding factor.

Decision Matrix

Choose Nylon When: (1) Impact toughness or fatigue resistance is critical — gears subject to shock loads, snap-fit assemblies, living hinges; (2) The part contacts fuels, oils, or greases — Nylon is the standard for fuel system components; (3) Higher mechanical loads require the stronger material — structural brackets, lift points, load-bearing bushings; (4) The application temperature exceeds Acetal's capability (>85°C HDT) — with glass fiber reinforcement, Nylon 66 GF30 reaches 245°C HDT; (5) The operating environment allows for or benefits from moisture absorption (e.g., bearings that self-lubricate when moist). Choose Acetal When: (1) Dimensional precision is paramount — precision gears, valve bodies, conveyor components where ±0.05mm tolerances must be maintained regardless of humidity; (2) Low friction in unlubricated conditions is needed — Acetal's 0.10-0.20 friction coefficient makes it the preferred unlubricated bearing material; (3) The part must not change properties or dimensions with moisture exposure — outdoor equipment, plumbing fixtures, precision assemblies; (4) Creep resistance under sustained load is critical — Acetal creeps less than Nylon, maintaining spring-back in snap-fits and clamp force in fasteners; (5) The application does NOT involve hot water or steam — Acetal's catastrophic depolymerization in hot water is an absolute disqualification for plumbing, food processing, or steam applications.

Comparison at a Glance

Material ANylon PA66 (Polyamide 66)
Material BAcetal POM (Polyoxymethylene)
Polymer TypeNylon: Semicrystalline (Tm 260°C) | Acetal: Semicrystalline (Tm 175°C)
Continuous Temp A80 °C
Continuous Temp B85 °C
Tensile Strength A82 MPa
Tensile Strength B62 MPa
Cost RelativeNylon PA66 and Acetal POM are similarly priced ($4-10/kg); Nylon is slightly less expensive
Best For AHigher-load mechanical components; gears, bearings, and bushings requiring toughness and fatigue resistance; applications involving impact or vibration; fuel-contact components; parts requiring higher temperature capability
Best For BPrecision gears and dimensional-critical components; low-friction unlubricated bearing surfaces; fuel system components requiring fuel resistance without moisture effects; applications requiring tight tolerances and stability without moisture conditioning

Equivalents & Cross-References

Equivalent / AlternateAction
Nylon-vs-Acetal
PA66-vs-POM
Polyamide-vs-Delrin
Share this page Share on X

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Acetal (POM) preferred for precision gears while Nylon is preferred for tough gears?

Acetal's dimensional stability (0.22% moisture absorption vs Nylon's 2.5%) means gear tooth profiles remain precise regardless of humidity — a critical requirement for instrument gears, timing mechanisms, and precision transmissions where backlash must be controlled. Acetal's lower and more stable friction coefficient (0.10-0.20) also provides smoother, quieter meshing. Nylon is preferred for power transmission gears subject to shock loads, vibration, and occasional overload because its superior toughness (2× higher notched Izod, especially when moist) prevents tooth fracture. Nylon gears also run quieter due to the material's inherent damping. A common design uses Acetal for the pinion (small gear requiring precision) and Nylon for the driven gear (larger gear absorbing load).

What is Acetal's catastrophic failure mode in hot water?

Acetal POM undergoes acid-catalyzed depolymerization (unzipping) in hot water — the polymer chain literally reverses back to formaldehyde monomer, starting from chain ends. Above 60°C in water, this reaction accelerates dramatically. The failure is catastrophic and unpredictable: a component that appears intact can rapidly disintegrate as the depolymerization front advances through the part wall. This is why Acetal is NEVER specified for hot water plumbing, steam traps, dishwasher components, or any application involving continuous hot water exposure. Nylon, by contrast, is hydrolysis-resistant in hot water (though it absorbs moisture and swells) and is the standard for plumbing fittings and water-handling components. This hot water limitation is the single most important constraint in Acetal material selection.

Related Diagnostics & Materials

Material Comparisons

PEEK vs Ultem PEI: Which High-Performance Polymer Should...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) if:Extreme chemical + thermal environments (oil...

Material Comparisons

PPS Ryton vs LCP Vectra: Which Ultra-Flow High-Temp...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PPS Ryton if:Chemical exposure + moderate flow length (automotive...

Material Comparisons

PTFE Teflon vs PEEK: Chemical Resistance vs Mechanical...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PTFE Teflon (Polytetrafluoroethylene) if:Seals, gaskets, liningswhere...

Material Comparisons

Vespel Polyimide vs PEEK: When the Highest-Temperature...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Vespel PI (Polyimide) if:Aerospace engine, semiconductor plasma, ultra-high...

Material Comparisons

Torlon PAI vs Vespel PI: Ultimate High-Temperature...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Torlon PAI (Polyamide-imide) if:lower cost, easier processingChoose Vespel...

Material Comparisons

Glass Fiber vs Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics:...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Glass Fiber Reinforced (GFR) if:Lower cost and easier processingChoose...

Material Comparisons

PEEK vs Torlon PAI: Complete Property, Cost &...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) if:PEEK offers melt-processability and lower...

Material Comparisons

Ultem PEI vs Polysulfone PSU: High-Temperature Amorphous...

Which Material Should You Choose?Choose Ultem PEI (Polyetherimide) if:Ultem offers 60°C higher HDT and inherent...

References & Industry Standards

  • ASTM International. Standard Specifications for Engineering Plastics & Thermoplastics. astm.org
  • UL Prospector. Plastics & Elastomers Material Database. ulprospector.com
  • MatWeb. Material Property Data for Engineering Thermoplastics. matweb.com
  • ISO 1043. Plastics — Symbols and Abbreviated Terms. iso.org